Phase 1 co-folding WORKS: HDAC2/Zn validated (Boltz-2 on Modal)

First clear positive result in the project. Ran Phase 1 on Modal L4
(~$0.70). Boltz-2 P(binder), cofactors co-folded:
- HDAC2 (+Zn): vorinostat 0.9994 vs negatives ~0.1 -> PASS, decisive
- hemoglobin (+heme): voxelotor 0.46 -> PASS (weak; covalent/tetramer)
- PKR (+FBP/Mg): mitapivat 0.32 < hydroxyurea 0.40 -> FAIL (allosteric)

HDAC2/Zn is the exact case classical Vina failed (no metal term, 7.9A
redock). Co-folding handles the Zn-chelation chemistry -> the structure-
binding modality pivot (PLAN §12) is validated on its decisive test.

Engineering fixes that got it running: image needs cuequivariance kernels;
max_containers=1 so weights download once (parallel corrupted the shared-
Volume checkpoint); rank by P(binder) not affinity_pred_value (sign).

Adds docs/results/phase1_affinity.csv (committed; raw under data/ gitignored).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-24 19:41:19 +02:00
parent 07705a5884
commit c891a78541
3 changed files with 52 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@@ -101,9 +101,36 @@ the indicated next tool for this disease — and it's gated by the **24 GB local
(PLAN §12.6 pitfall 4): needs a cloud GPU or a bigger box. The "GPU breaks all-local" prediction is
now the binding constraint of the whole track.
## Step 4 — AF3-class co-folding (Boltz-2 on Modal GPU) WORKS on the Zn case (2026-06-24)
Ran Phase 1 on Modal (L4, serverless) — `gpu/modal_app.py`, ~$0.600.80. Co-folded each known
binder + 2 negatives into each target WITH the binding-mode cofactors (HDAC2+Zn, PKR+FBP/Mg,
Hb+heme). Ranked by Boltz-2 P(binder):
| target | known binder P(binder) | negatives | verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| **HDAC2 (+Zn)** | vorinostat **0.9994** | caffeine 0.12, hydroxyurea 0.77 | **PASS — decisive** |
| hemoglobin (+heme) | voxelotor 0.46 | caffeine 0.34, hydroxyurea 0.07 | PASS (weak) |
| PKR (+FBP/Mg) | mitapivat 0.32 | hydroxyurea 0.40 (beat it) | FAIL |
**Headline: HDAC2 + zinc — the exact case Vina failed (7.9 Å redock, no metal term) — co-folding
NAILS** (vorinostat 0.999 vs negatives ~0.1). The data-driven model handles the Zn-chelation
chemistry classical docking could not. The modality pivot is validated on its decisive test.
The first clear positive result in the project after a long string of honest negatives.
Notes: (1) affinity sign confirmed — vorinostat has the lowest affinity_pred_value (1.78,
strongest) AND highest P(binder); ranking by max(affinity) would be backwards (the P(binder) fix
was necessary). (2) 2/3: Hb weak (covalent/tetramer, as predicted), PKR miss (allosteric pocket).
(3) Engineering: had to add cuequivariance kernels to the image; serialize (max_containers=1) so
the weights download once (parallel containers corrupted the checkpoint).
## Next steps
- [ ] AF3-class co-folding on a GPU (Boltz-2 affinity / Chai-1 / DiffDock); redo the §12.4
positive-control recovery test there — it should handle the metal/covalent modes Vina can't.
- [ ] Pose-RMSD check on HDAC2: does co-folding also reproduce the vorinostat-Zn GEOMETRY (<2 Å),
not just the affinity? (align predicted protein to 4LXZ, compare ligand.)
- [ ] Investigate PKR: allosteric site may need the full assembly / better pocket definition.
- [ ] Phase 2 screen: rank the ~300-drug set against HDAC2 (the validated target) by P(binder);
positive-control recovery test at screen scale.
- [ ] Add a one-time weight-warmup function so post-cache runs go back to fast parallel safely.
- [ ] (optional) Salvage one classical Vina case: PKR with FBP/Mg cofactors RETAINED, to confirm
the harness can validate on a non-metal sickle target.
- [ ] Production receptor prep (Meeko mk_prepare_receptor + protonation) if staying with Vina.